Research Interview

Mosquitoes
have ears.

Ultrasonic mosquito repellents have long been dismissed as “ineffective.” Yet the criticism was aimed not at ultrasound itself, but at devices that failed to use it properly. Together with Professor Hyung Wook Kwon, who has studied mosquito sensory systems for nearly 20 years, we examined what went wrong and how MOSLOCK was designed differently.

Vector Insect Rearing and Analysis Laboratory at Incheon National University
FIELD NOTE 01 Vector Insect Rearing and Analysis Laboratory

Key points

  1. Mosquitoes possess an auditory organ called Johnston’s organ An ear-like organ densely packed with auditory neurons
  2. Two reasons earlier ultrasonic products failed Unidentified repellent frequencies · sound pressure too low to reach mosquitoes
  3. How MOSLOCK differs in design and validation Higher sound pressure · variable frequencies · WHO-based testing · three years of development

Researcher

What kind of research have you pursued?

He is a researcher who has used neuroscience to uncover how insects respond to sound and odor. Professor Kwon trained in entomology and has focused primarily on mosquitoes and honeybees.

The Institute of Vector-Borne Disease Research at Incheon National University, which he directs, uses mosquitoes as an insect model and combines neuroscience, mechanical engineering, and artificial intelligence in vector-control research. The work has expanded from observing insects to developing control technologies based on insect biology; its in-house AI mosquito analysis system is one example.

“I have studied how insects respond to stimuli such as sound and odor, using neuroscience to identify the underlying mechanisms.”

Professor Hyung Wook Kwon, Director of the Institute of Vector-Borne Disease Research
Plaque for the Institute of Vector-Borne Disease Research, designated an Outstanding Research Institute by Incheon National University
Designated an Outstanding Research Institute by Incheon National University (Oct. 2024-Sep. 2026)

VIDEO · RESEARCH INTERVIEW

Can mosquitoes really hear?
We asked an entomologist who has studied the question for 20 years.

Professor Hyung Wook Kwon of Incheon National University explains the mosquito auditory organ and the experiments used to investigate responses to ultrasound.

Watch on YouTube

Detection

How do mosquitoes find people from so far away?

They follow carbon dioxide, body heat, and odors emitted by people and animals. Mosquitoes use these signals as clues to locate targets from a distance. When they get close and determine that the source is not a person or animal, they turn back. Their sensory organs are that finely tuned.

  • Carbon dioxideTracks changes in CO2 concentration from a distance
  • OdorIdentifies chemicals from sweat and skin through olfactory receptors
  • VisionUses visual cues to narrow down a target after detecting odor
  • HeatDetects temperature differences caused by body heat at close range

These are the senses mosquitoes use to find people. Separately, mosquitoes also have a dedicated organ for detecting sound.

  • SoundDetects sound waves through Johnston’s organ in the antennae - the starting point for MOSLOCK’s ultrasonic mosquito-repellent research and development

Auditory organ

Do mosquitoes really have ears?

Yes. It is called Johnston’s organ. Named after its discoverer, it serves a role comparable to the human ear. Located at the base of the antenna, it contains a dense concentration of auditory neurons.

Distribution of neurons in a mosquito Johnston’s organ observed with fluorescent labeling
Johnston’s organ observed with fluorescent labeling. Auditory neurons are densely arranged in a radial pattern.

Johnston’s organ is known to respond well to sound waves in the approximate 100-1,000Hz range. An electrophysiological study of male northern house mosquitoes (Culex pipiens) reported at least eight groups of auditory neurons tuned to different frequencies, with individual tuning frequencies distributed from 85 to 470Hz. It is considered one of the most complex mechanosensory structures found in insects.

Human hearing range and the range Johnston’s organ is known to detect well

20Hz 100Hz 1kHz 20kHz

Teal band - the 100-1,000Hz range that Johnston’s organ is known to detect well. (The horizontal axis uses a logarithmic scale.)

“In insects, the organ corresponding to our ear is Johnston’s organ, where many auditory neurons are densely concentrated.”

Professor Hyung Wook Kwon

HEARING RANGE ≠ REPELLENCY MECHANISM

The range mosquitoes hear well
is not the same as the mechanism behind repellency.

The known detection range of Johnston’s organ is about 100-1,000Hz. By contrast, ultrasound repellency experiments on Aedes aegypti primarily used 30-100kHz. The findings therefore cannot be explained simply by saying, “Mosquitoes hear up to 1,000Hz, so they hear ultrasound and flee.”

Auditory detection range 100~1,000Hz

The vibration and auditory range Johnston’s organ is known to detect well

Repellency test range 30~100kHz

The principal ultrasound range used to assess behavior, host seeking, and molecular responses

01 · SOUND PRESSURE

Sound pressure, not frequency alone

Across conditions from 50 to 110dB, repellency tended to increase as sound pressure rose.

02 · BEHAVIORAL SUPPRESSION

Immediate approach suppression

In a CO₂-attraction wind tunnel and a two-part chamber, movement and approach decreased under specific ultrasound conditions.

03 · PHYSIOLOGY

Changes in sensory-related gene expression

After 24 hours of exposure to 100kHz at 90dB, reduced expression of the CO₂-receptor-related gene AaGr3 and altered expression of the hearing-related gene AAEL009258 were observed.

04 · HOST SEEKING

Reduced host-seeking behavior

Mosquitoes exposed to 30kHz or 100kHz at 90dB for 24 hours showed reduced attempts to land on a human hand for up to 48 hours afterward.

CORE PRINCIPLE

The key is not simply whether mosquitoes can hear it. The research suggests that ultrasound at sufficient sound pressure may alter mosquito approach behavior and the CO₂-based host-detection system, thereby suppressing movement toward people.

The paper identifies an association between reduced behavior and changes in gene expression, but does not establish the change in AaGr3 as the sole cause of repellency. In a separate survival test, 24-hour exposure at 30, 45, 80, or 450kHz and 90dB did not affect survival.

Measurement methods

How do you confirm that mosquitoes actually detected sound?

By measuring electrical signals or imaging changes in living tissue.

The first method is electrophysiology. Just as hospitals measure electrical activity in the heart (ECG) or brain (EEG), researchers directly record the activity of neurons concentrated in Johnston’s organ. If the mosquito detects sound, an electrical signal appears at that moment.

The second method is live imaging, which observes tissue changes in real time after stimulation. The same approach is used with honeybees and fruit flies as well as mosquitoes.

Electrophysiology equipment used to measure electrical activity in Johnston’s organ
Electrophysiology equipment used to measure electrical activity in Johnston’s organ.

Limitations of earlier products

Why, then, have ultrasonic mosquito repellents been considered “ineffective”?

Not because mosquitoes lack hearing, but because the devices did not deliver a meaningful acoustic stimulus to them.

Ultrasonic repellents have been controversial since the 1990s. Multiple validation studies failed to confirm repellency, causing distrust of the entire product category. Professor Kwon points to two reasons.

  1. The repellent frequencies were not identified There are frequency ranges that mosquitoes avoid, but earlier research lacked sufficient methods to identify them scientifically.
  2. The sound pressure was too low Even at the right frequency, a weak sound is effectively no stimulus at all from the mosquito’s perspective.

“If the sound is weak or we fail to identify the right frequency, it is a meaningless stimulus from the mosquito’s perspective. I think that may explain those results.”

Professor Hyung Wook Kwon

In short, the negative verdict was less ‘ultrasound does not work’ and more ‘devices that fail to meet the necessary conditions do not work.’ The next research question was whether those conditions could be met - this became the challenge for subsequent commercialization research.

MOSLOCK design

How did MOSLOCK address the limitations of earlier ultrasonic products?

We redesigned three factors: sound pressure, space, and frequency.

Sound pressure

Conventional Low output often failed to reach mosquitoes at an effective level
MOSLOCK Designed with significantly higher sound pressure than previous devices > Uses high-output ultrasonic speakers*

Spatial conditions

Conventional Did not account for ultrasound’s strong directionality and limited reach
MOSLOCK Repeatedly tested with room size, layout, and mosquito hiding spots as variables > Five high-output speakers with 360-degree rotation

Frequency

Conventional Fixed, single-frequency output
MOSLOCK Continuously varies frequencies to delay adaptation (Multi Sweep)

“With a product like MOSLOCK, we increased sound pressure by a hundredfold or even a thousandfold compared with existing devices, which may be why it produced somewhat better results.”

Professor Hyung Wook Kwon

* The multipliers mentioned in the interview are comparative values from the research process and may vary by measurement conditions.

Variable frequency

MOSLOCK continuously changes frequency. Why was it designed that way?

Because living organisms adapt to repeated stimuli. When the same stimulus continues and is judged not to be a real threat, an organism gradually begins to ignore it. This is called habituation.

A mosquito follows the same pattern when exposed continuously to one fixed frequency: it is startled at first, then adapts. MOSLOCK therefore introduces unpredictable variation. Continually changing frequencies lengthens the time required for adaptation.

Fixed-frequency output

Repeated identical stimulus → habituation (adaptation)

Variable-frequency output (Multi Sweep)

Unpredictable variation → delays adaptation

“When we introduce many unpredictable variables, mosquitoes take longer to adapt. That is why we designed it this way.”

Professor Hyung Wook Kwon

Validation

How is MOSLOCK’s ultrasonic repellency verified in the laboratory?

We use repellent-testing methods established by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a benchmark. Typical behavioral tests include exposing an arm or observing a person inside a test chamber.

Two additional layers are added: imaging to observe what happens in Johnston’s organ, and molecular analysis to determine whether receptors change. An effect is recognized only when behavioral, physiological, and molecular results point in the same direction.

Experimental setup for observing mosquito repellency using an ultrasound emitter and carbon dioxide in A/B chambers separated by a soundproof wall
A two-part A/B chamber separated by a soundproof wall. An ultrasound emitter and CO₂ supply/measurement equipment are placed on one side, and mosquito movement through the passage is observed to assess repellency.

Evaluation criterion - A 100% result is not realistic in biological experiments. Professor Kwon explains that repellency above 70-80% can be interpreted as showing a meaningful degree of effect.

MOSLOCK was designed to meet or exceed this benchmark. The results can be reviewed in the test reports below.

2026 RELEASE · TEST EVIDENCE

From research to product.
Revalidated under real-world conditions before launch.

MOSLOCK, launched in 2026, was tested for mosquito repellency under different conditions, including car camping with a docking tent, a vehicle interior, and a reverberation chamber. Tests were conducted with a MOSLOCK prototype in the mosquito rearing laboratory at Incheon National University.

White and black MOSLOCK products launched in 2026
2026 MOSLOCK · WHITE / BLACK

TEST 01 · REAL ENVIRONMENT

Car camping + docking tent

97.4%

Average reduction in blood-feeding attempts

Jun. 25, 2025 · Device OFF: 20/18 attempts → ON: 1/0

TEST 02 · VEHICLE

Vehicle interior test

95%

Reduction in blood-feeding attempts

Aug. 27-28, 2024 · Device OFF: 20 attempts → ON: 1

TEST 03 · CHAMBER

Reverberation chamber test

83.3%

Suppression of attraction behavior

Nov. 4-5, 2024 · Attraction suppressed in 10 of 12 mosquitoes

* Results were measured under the stated test conditions and may vary with mosquito species, population, room size, ventilation, and other real-world conditions.

MOSLOCK test summary and original test reports
Test summary and captured images of the original reports (personal information removed)

Publication

How much has been established so far?

The behavioral and molecular findings were published in a peer-reviewed paper. In 2021, the team reported ultrasound-associated approach suppression, reduced host-seeking behavior, and changes in sensory-related gene expression in Aedes aegypti. A related patent was filed during the commercialization R&D process, and a follow-up paper is also in preparation.

Foundational research paper

  • TitleBehavioral and molecular responses of Aedes aegypti to ultrasound
  • AuthorsDong-In Kim, Rustem Ilyasov, Ural Yunusbaev, Sung-Hwa Lee, Hyung Wook Kwon
  • JournalJournal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 24 (2021), 429-435
  • Key findingsReduced approach and host-seeking behavior, with changes in AaGr3 and AAEL009258 expression under high-sound-pressure ultrasound

“We published evidence that mosquitoes respond to ultrasound and show repellent behavior.”

Professor Hyung Wook Kwon

Development period

MOSLOCK took more than three years to develop. Why did it take so long?

Because the validation had to expand in stages and be repeated for each real-world use environment. It was a process of repeatedly asking the same question while changing one condition at a time.

1. Expanding the stages of validation

  1. Preliminary test - Confirm basic responses in a controlled indoor environment
  2. Semi-field test - Revalidate under conditions designed to resemble the outdoors
  3. Field test - Confirm whether results hold under real-world conditions

Each stage required a separate setup aligned with World Health Organization test methods. Different objectives called for different equipment, including chambers entered by a person and devices used to observe responses to an exposed arm.

2. Repeating tests for each use environment

Ultrasound is highly directional and does not travel far. This means the same device can produce different results depending on the size and shape of the space, so each real-world environment was tested separately.

  • IndoorsCheck responses in enclosed spaces such as bedrooms
  • Vehicle interiorCheck sound-pressure distribution and responses in a narrow space with many reflective surfaces
  • Docking tentCheck the effective range in larger conditions such as car camping

Because sound-pressure coverage and mosquito hiding places differ by space, even device placement had to be tested repeatedly.

Interior of the Vector Insect Rearing and Analysis Laboratory with mosquito cages and temperature- and humidity-controlled chambers
Vector Insect Rearing and Analysis Laboratory. Test insects are maintained in rearing cages and temperature- and humidity-controlled chambers.

Use

Where is the best place to use MOSLOCK in a bedroom?

Near the head of the bed or by your feet. Mosquitoes often target the head and feet when seeking a blood meal because these areas produce strong carbon-dioxide and sweat cues.

The space also matters. Ultrasound is highly directional and has limited reach, so it is better suited to a somewhat enclosed space such as a bedroom than to a large open area.

Bedroom setting with MOSLOCK placed on a bedside table
Example placement on a bedside table. A relatively enclosed bedroom environment is advantageous.

Research direction

Why did you continue researching mosquito repellency using sound rather than insecticides?

If mosquitoes have Johnston’s organ, whether they can be influenced through sound was a question worth investigating. If mosquitoes could be managed through a physical method rather than chemicals, that alone made the subject worth pursuing. The research continued for nearly 20 years.

There is also a broader issue behind this research. One of the greatest challenges in mosquito control is insecticide overuse and the resistance it creates. Insecticides also affect insects other than mosquitoes, and heavier use causes greater environmental damage. Killing more mosquitoes is not always an unqualified good.

The direction is therefore shifting: from killing every mosquito to self-protective approaches that keep mosquitoes away from the individual.

“I believe we should seek scientific, environmentally friendly approaches that allow people to protect themselves.”

Professor Hyung Wook Kwon

Summary

The existence of a mosquito auditory organ was already established.
The remaining question was what stimulus to deliver, and at what sound pressure.

  • 01Confirmation of Johnston’s organ, the mosquito auditory organ
  • 02Why earlier ultrasonic products failed - unidentified frequencies and low sound pressure
  • 03Publication of foundational research showing mosquito responses to ultrasound
  • 04MOSLOCK’s response — higher sound pressure · variable frequencies · spatially informed design
  • 05Three-stage testing based on WHO methods and validation across use environments
  • 06Nearly 20 years of research and more than three years of development

Notes and references

  • This content was edited and reconstructed from an interview with Professor Hyung Wook Kwon of the Institute of Vector-Borne Disease Research at Incheon National University. Statements in quotation marks are based on interview remarks and may have been lightly edited for clarity.
  • Experimental results, including repellency rates, may vary with spatial structure, distance, mosquito species, individual condition, and other test variables. Identical performance in every real-world environment is not guaranteed.
  • This page does not claim the efficacy or effects of a pharmaceutical or quasi-drug product.
  • Reference: Lapshin & Vorontsov, “Frequency organization of the Johnston’s organ in male mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae)”, Journal of Experimental Biology, 2017. View original
  • Reference: Kim et al., “Behavioral and molecular responses of Aedes aegypti to ultrasound”, Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 24 (2021), 429-435.

MOSLOCK · 2026 RELEASE

We studied sound that reaches mosquitoes,
then designed a product for real living spaces.

Visit the MOSLOCK product page